Stay Connected


Join our newsletter

Get the latest news delivered to your inbox.

Why Less is More: The Case for Private Equity in the Lower Middle Market

Stephen Beauchamp | Director of Research & Investments

(5 minute read)

Every year, hundreds of private equity funds raise billions of dollars, all with the goal of acquiring business interests, creating value, and realizing returns for investors. Against macroeconomic uncertainty and rising rates, 2022 saw a notable drop-off in fund count (-42%) and dollars raised (-20%) following a banner year in 2021. Even still, 742 funds raised $464.2B in 2022, and through March 31, 2023, 103 private equity funds raised $97.1B with approximately 71% raised in North America according to PitchBook. [1] With a finite amount of capital to invest and an overwhelming selection of investment options, Brightside Partners’ investment team focuses on the best potential risk-adjusted returns for our clients. We have and continue to believe that the lower middle market segment of private equity can provide compelling risk-adjusted returns given its inherent inefficiencies and position in the capital markets. 

Large pool of investment opportunities

To start, the lower middle market provides a large pool of investment opportunities. According to the National Center for the Middle Market (“NCMM”), there are nearly 200,000 middle market companies in the U.S. The NCMM defines the middle market as businesses with revenues ranging from $10M to $1B, which includes the following segments: upper middle market (revenues between $100M and $1B), core middle market (revenues between $50M and $100M), and lower middle market (revenues between $10M and $50M). Moreover, the NCMM reports that lower middle market companies grew revenue by 11.6% in 2022. [2]  We believe the size of the middle market reduces the likelihood of private equity sponsors competing against one another to acquire businesses. Instead, the sponsors with which we invest are often sourcing investments proprietarily through industry conferences, networking, and referrals. 

Limited alternatives for Capital

Following the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in 2007-2009, the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) was enacted. Among the many impacts of this massive piece of legislation were stricter capital reserve requirements for banks, which led to a pullback in lending to the middle market. Furthermore, Dodd-Frank accelerated consolidation of small and regional banks through acquisitions by larger banks. This exacerbated the pullback in middle market lending as larger banks are less likely to lend to regional businesses with smaller financial profiles (i.e., lower revenue and profitability). As a result, lower middle market companies are increasingly relying on non-bank financial institutions to secure funding for growth, which has led to increasing investment by private equity firms. As the opportunity set grows, private equity firms attempt to differentiate themselves from their peers by providing both capital and hands-on support to help their portfolio companies take their businesses to the next level.

Compelling value-add opportunities

By their very nature, smaller companies can grow faster than their larger counterparts, but that alone does not warrant investment. More importantly, many companies in the lower middle market have “low hanging fruit” for unlocking value for owners. Many lower middle market businesses are family- or founder-operated and have simply done things a certain way without considering the alternatives. Private equity sponsors in the lower middle market are often the first institutional capital invested in these family businesses. Therefore, skilled private equity sponsors can implement best practices and improve financial reporting, technology, management, efficiency, and more to increase profitability and create value. For this reason, we pay attention to whether a private equity team has meaningful operating experience. Examples of common value-add initiatives include building out sales teams, bringing on C-suite talent, and implementing ERP software; these are often “easy fixes” that have meaningful positive effects.

Direct sourcing of investment opportunities

RCP Advisors is one of the largest investors in the lower middle market segment of private equity in North America. According to their internal database, which contains information on more than 36,000 transactions, median purchase price multiples on <$100M enterprise value companies were 8.4x (EV/EBITDA) in 2022 and averaged 6.9x since 2005. In contrast, PitchBook data on the broader U.S. private equity buyout market reported a median purchase price multiple of 11.5x in 2022 and 9.5x average since 2005. [3] This dynamic in the lower middle market provides private equity investors the opportunity to acquire businesses at more attractive valuations (relative to the upper middle market), grow them into the upper end of the middle market, and exit them at higher valuation multiples. 

Lower leverage

RCP Advisors’ data also show that lower middle market companies tend to transact with lower debt levels than their larger counterparts. According to their internal database, median entry net debt levels on transactions involving <$100M enterprise value companies were 3.7x (Net Debt/EBITDA) in 2022 and averaged 2.9x since 2005. In contrast, PitchBook data on the broader U.S. private equity buyout market reported a median Debt/EBITDA multiple of 5.9x in 2022 and 5.4x average since 2005. [4] With less debt in their capital structures (i.e., lower debt service costs), we believe lower middle market companies are more resilient in the face of economic downturns or rising rate environments. This thesis is supported by lower defaults rates in the lower middle market direct lending market versus the leveraged loan market.

Multiple exit opportunities

We believe private equity sponsors in the lower middle market have the luxury of more exit options than those investing in the upper middle market and large cap markets. Lower middle market companies can be exited via sale to a strategic acquirer (either a large corporate or a PE rollup), acquired by a larger private equity fund better suited to grow them to the next level, or go public. In contrast, larger companies may have access to fewer options (e.g., exit to Fortune 100 or public markets) given their scale. Exit optionality is attractive, as it provides the sponsor the ability to pick the best option for LPs.

[1] Pitchbook. Global Private Market Fundraising Report Q1 2023. May 24, 2023.

[2] National Center for the Middle Market. Mid-Year 2023 Middle Market Indicator. 2023.

[3] RCP Advisors: GPScout – RCP’s proprietary analytics database – provides private fund and investment-level performance data and analytics drawn from fundraising and diligence documents produced by general partners and publicly available information, as well as quarterly unaudited and audited annual financial statements produced by RCP’s underlying fund managers. RCP has not independently verified any such information provided or available to RCP.

[4} RCP Advisors:GPScout

Disclaimer

Brightside Advisory Partners, LLC (hereinafter “Brightside Partners” or “the Firm”) is a registered investment adviser with its principal place of business in the State of Maryland. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Additional information about Brightside Partners, including our registration status, fees, and services is available on the SEC’s website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov.


Brightside Partners does not make any representations as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether referenced or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility, therefore. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.


The views, opinions, and projected results expressed in this material are current through the date reflected on the cover of this report. They are subject to change at any time based on a variety of factors. Furthermore, this report contains certain forward-looking statements that indicate future possibilities. Due to known and unknown risks, other uncertainties and factors, actual results may differ materially from the expectations portrayed in such forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. There can be no guarantee that the views and opinions expressed in this report will come to pass, that Brightside Partners will achieve comparable results to those set forth herein, or that it will be able to avoid losses. Any financial or other projections are illustrative only and should not be taken as forecasts or promises which may be relied on. 


This material should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. This material should not be construed as personalized investment advice and investors should consult with an experienced financial advisor before investing or implementing any investment strategy. This material is provided on a confidential basis for discussion purposes only and is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase an interest or any other security or financial instrument.

By The Brightside Partners Investment Team 10 Oct, 2023
This piece delves into the historical context of how conflicts in the Middle East have affected markets and advises investors to maintain perspective and hold onto diversified portfolios rather than making drastic portfolio changes in response to geopolitical events.
By The Exit Planning Institute 20 Sep, 2023
Understanding the impact of intangible capitals can be a key component to unlocking value within your business. This article from the Exit Planning Institute highlights how the four intangible capitals weigh into business value.
Share by: